The University of the South Pacific          
Final Examination
Semester 2 - 2002
Emalus Campus
 

 

 

SCHOOL OF LAW

 

 

COURSE NAME:                                   LEGAL SYSTEMS II

 

 

COURSE NO:                                        LA101

 

 

TIME ALLOWED:                                  Three (3) Hours

 

 

READING TIME:                                    Ten (10) Minutes

 

 

NUMBER OF PAGES:                            Four (4), including cover page

 

 

NUMBER OF QUESTIONS ON PAPER:              Eight (8)

 

 

NUMBER OF QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED: Five - The compulsory question in section “A” and any four (4) in section “B”

 

 

MARK ALLOCATED FOR EACH QUESTION:     The compulsory question in section “A” carries fifteen (15) marks and the four questions in section “B” carry ten (10) marks each.

 

 

TOTAL MARKS:                                                       Fifty-five (55)                           

 

 

 

MATERIALS PERMITTED IN EXAMINATION ROOM:  Unannotated or unmarked copies of LA 101 Reader Volumes 1-3.

 

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: You are required to do five (5) questions only: the compulsory question in section A and any four (4) questions in section B. Do not forget to cite legal authorities for your answers.

 

SECTION A

 

This section has only one question which is compulsory and it carries fifteen (15) marks.  The recommended length of answers to this question is around six paragraphs or up to three pages of the examination answer book.

 

QUESTION ONE

The Chief Justice of Vanuatu established by warrant the Efate Island Court pursuant to the powers conferred on him by the Island Courts Act 1983. (An excerpt of that legislation is in the LA101 Reader volume 1 at pages 135-37).

The warrant stipulated the territorial jurisdiction of the Court, being, “the island of Efate and the immediate, surrounding islands namely Hideaway, Hat, Lelepa, Moso, Pele and Muna islands.” Thus, over this defined geographical area, the court is authorised, under section 10 of the Act, to administer the customary law prevailing within the area in order to deal with specified civil and criminal matters.

Of the civil jurisdiction of Island Courts, section 8 of the Act says:

[T]he civil jurisdiction of an island court extends to the hearing, trial and determination of all civil matters in which the defendant is ordinarily resident within the territorial jurisdiction of the court or within which the cause of action arose.

When exercising jurisdiction over civil matters, an island court is authorised by section 13 of the Act to make orders for one or more of the following: payment of monetary compensation, restitution of property, occupation or vacation of land, and restraining orders.

Concerning the membership of the court, section 3(1) of the Act says that the justices of the island court are appointed by the President acting in accordance with the advice of the Judicial Services Commission and must number not less than three, one of whom must be a custom chief residing within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

Assume that last Friday the Efate Island court sitting at Erakor village handed down its decision in a civil case between Chief Beru of Banks (in Torba province) & Chief Aru of Ambae (in Penama province), both of whom now live at Teuoma on Efate Island. The court found that according to the customary laws of the people of Ambae, Chief Aru was obligated to settle some customary debts of his people and ordered Chief Aru to pay four adult pigs to Chief Beru (on behalf of the Banks Islanders).

Chief Beru initiated the case on behalf of his people who live in Banks. It was alleged in court that last year some Ambae islanders sent a request to people in Banks to gather and ship to Ambae a certain sea shell which was a traditional valuable on Ambae. The Banks Islanders sent tonnes of the stuff but waited in vain for the four adult pigs promised to them by the Ambae Islanders as payment. After unsuccessfully making several attempts to demand payment, the Banks Islanders visited Efate and asked Chief Beru to bring the case against Chief Aru who happens to come from Ambae.  

According to the local newspapers, the decision in that case was made by three justices who were appointed by the Prime Minister’s office in consultation with the President of the Republic and none of whom is a custom chief.

Chief Aru is not happy with this decision of the Island Court. He comes to your legal practice at Port Vila and instructs you to lodge an appeal against this decision.

Identify and explain three (3) possible grounds that you could raise in your appeal. In your discussion refer to relevant cases from common law countries to support your arguments.

(15 marks)

******************************************************************************

 

SECTION B

 

This section contains seven (7) optional questions of which you are required to answer only four (4). Each question in this section carries ten (10) marks so the total number of marks for this section is forty (40).

 

QUESTION TWO

 

It is often said that once upon a time in England, “the King was the fountain of the common law.” Explain this statement with reference to the evolution of the main common law courts. Also explain the four main facets of practice which these courts evolved.

(10 marks)

QUESTION THREE

 

Describe the procedural steps one, two, three and five as commonly used in civil cases that come before the courts. In your discussion, also explain how these steps serve to facilitate natural justice.

 (10 marks)

QUESTION FOUR

 

Discuss the meaning of res judicata and the scope of the two main types of estoppel that it creates. In your discussion, refer to relevant cases to illustrate the matters you discuss.

 (10 marks)

 

QUESTION FIVE

 

The courts at common law have developed rules which set preconditions before certain evidence is admitted or introduced before the courts. Identify and discuss the two main types of preconditions which the courts insist upon.  

(10 marks)

QUESTION SIX

 

With reference to decided cases, explain the effects of adopting a generous and flexible interpretation of words in a written Constitution.  Also explain the circumstances under which the courts choose not to follow this approach.    

(10 marks)

QUESTION SEVEN

 

With reference to one or two cases, identify and explain five (5) prohibitions on the exercise of discretion as recognised at common law.

 

 (10 marks)

QUESTION EIGHT

 

In one or two paragraphs, explain the meanings and, where appropriate, give an example of any five of the following words or phrases as used in the context of the LA101 course:

 

(a)  Appellate jurisdiction

(b)  Original Jurisdiction

(c)   Statutory revisionary jurisdiction

(d)   Res Judicata

(e)   Abuse of court process

(f)      Ratio decidendii

(g)   Stare decis

(h)   Persuasive precedent

(i)       Obiter dicta

(j)      Binding precedent

(10 marks)

 

 

 

Text Box: End of Examination Paper
&
Good luck with it!