Summer 2006 Ian
Fraser
______________________________________________________________________
1. value: 15 marks
Choose one of the following situations and
give legal analyses of it from each
of the points of view indicated.
A.
The
attempt by President Sokomanu of
Points of view –
Positivist; Realist.
OR
B.
The current trial of Saddam Hussein in
Points of view –
Natural-Law; Realist.
OR
C.
The decisions in Prasad v A-G
Points of view –
Natural-Law; Positivist.
2. Choose one of the
following questions. value: 10 marks
A. What is
the most disadvantaged large class of citizens of your jurisdiction?
If
you could address them all, how would you persuade them to accept the current state of the law?
How
well do you think you would succeed?
OR
B. Does litigation
in your jurisdiction ever serve as a "forum of principle"?
What
legal reforms would promote that happening?
Does
your jurisdiction need something like this from its courts?
3. Choose one of the
following questions. value: 10 marks
A. "Even when
the government loses in court, it gains, for the legitimacy of its judicial system is demonstrated."
Comment
on the applicability of this dictum to your jurisdiction OR to the South Pacific region.
OR
B. What should the
role(s) be of the
4. Choose one of the
following questions. value: 10 marks
A. "Political
accountability is primarily a political issue, not a legal one; ballots will always be more effective than
writs."
Comment
on the applicability of this dictum to your jurisdiction.
OR
B. Provide the
outline, and some content, of a course in the jurisprudence of your custom, as it exists today (in English!).
5. Answer Q-A, AND Q-B or Q-C or Q-D. value: 5 marks
each
A. You have
been taught a particular style in mooting, with a view to courtroom practice.
Do you think the style manifests a cultural bias in favour
of European ways, a sexist bias in favour of
masculine ways, or simply the requirements of advocacy?
If the latter, is that kind of advocacy necessary to a workable
formal legal system in the region?
AND ONE OF:
B. Would
(or does) it change the nature of customary rights to
compensation if they are exercised as individual rights? (that
is, if the individual person whose act or experience is the 'cause of action'
decides personally & alone how the claim will proceed)
C. Describe the
policies or principles you think are applicable to the
As
law, what are the 'sources' of these policies or principles?
D. If we took the
undertaking by Cmdr Bainimarama to PM Qarase – not to
speak to the media without first consulting the government – to be a rule, what would you foresee to be the standards involved that could raise
difficulties in the rule's application?