|
Examinations
Semester 2 - 2004
|
Emalus Campus
|
COURSE NAME: Advanced Pacific Dispute Resolution
COURSE NO: LA402
TIME ALLOWED: 3 hours
READING TIME: 10 minutes
NUMBER OF PAGES: 2
NUMBER OF QUESTIONS ON PAPER: 5
NUMBER OF QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED: 2
MARK ALLOCATED FOR EACH QUESTION: 20
TOTAL MARKS: 40
MATERIALS PERMITTED IN EXAMINATION ROOM:
None
Answer any two of the
following 5 questions. All questions are
of equal value.
Question 1
It is constitutionally vital to rely on culturally-blind and
objectively neutral dispute resolution processes. To what extent is this statement true and
how does this inhibit the use of forms of dispute resolution in the South
Pacific?
Question 2
It is generally accepted that the state should provide for the institution of
formal courts to administer justice.
Apart from this core function, how far can the state successfully
venture into other areas of dispute resolution?
You may confine your answer to one or more states in the South Pacific.
Question 3
Robert Coulson, President of the American
Arbitration Association wrote:
"Lawyers are in a bind when it comes
to managing their clients' disputes if they are locked into the courts.
Litigation has not kept up with modern, fast-moving society ... there have been
revolutionary changes in business, practices since the basic court structure
was adopted from English common law ... Compared to modern business, civil courts
have changed very little ... Alternative dispute resolution gives lawyers an
opportunity to use new processes, encourages a problem-solving attitude (and)
an openness to compromise..”
Discuss this proposition in relation to the resolution of commercial
disputes within the offshore financial centres of the South Pacific.
Question 4
One assumption that accompanied original (western) ventures into
ADR was that it was akin to and accommodating of dialogue based traditional
societies. It is ironic therefore that
as ADR has developed, it has adopted generic forms that exclude cultural
realities and needs. Discuss.
Question 5
Forms of dispute resolution may roughly be divided into those that are
consensual (those that require the good will of the parties) and those that are
coerced. Discuss this dichotomy with
reference to the resolution of disputes in the contemporary South Pacific
region or country within the region.